3 ms·
> I do not understand the underlying logic of this argument. Just because you don't understand the logic of the argument doesn't invalidate it.
by mbesto 9y ago
> I do not understand the underlying logic of this argument.
Just because you don't understand the logic of the argument doesn't invalidate it.
- tptacek 9y agoThat's obviously true, but doesn't get us anywhere.
- mbesto 9y agoI generally appreciate your commentary and authority on certain topics, but the "I'm right, you're wrong" / "I can't understand this rationale so I'm going to dismiss it" attitude here certainly isn't going to get us anywhere either. I think we both agree that allowing anyone to invest without an accreditation is probably harmful, however don't you think it's worth discussing/investigating the negative externalities of such an accreditation?
- tptacek 9y agoWhat are the negative externalities of accreditation?