3 ms·
Vegas has become family friendly, so to speak. Who assumes liability for the images of children? What are the legal protections around the storage, retention,
by LinuxBender 9y ago
Vegas has become family friendly, so to speak. Who assumes liability for the images of children? What are the legal protections around the storage, retention, secure deletion, handling and viewing of the images?
- reaperducer 9y agoVegas (and all Nevada) casinos are like another planet from a legal sense. Once you're on their property, they can do pretty much anything they want to you. You consented to all of it by going there. Kids? Their parents consented to it by bringing them there in the first place. It's not like being scanned at an airport, which is a quasi-public place. You're on private, highly regulated, surveilled, scanned, documented, recorded, profiled, archived property. Where things get fuzzy is if you're in a Vegas hotel without a casino.
- LinuxBender 9y agoAre there no state or federal laws that regulate the storage and dissemination of nude children? I did not realize casinos were that powerful.
- reaperducer 9y agoIf there were pictures of nude children involved. But that's not what's happening here. Your hysteria borders on strawman.
- LinuxBender 9y agoI didn't realize I was hysterical? Just asking a question based on the article and discussion in this thread. Do you have links to images from the scanner?
- jakobegger 9y agoThis scanner does not make images. It‘s a fancy metal detector with a 2m range.
- revmoo 9y agoPlease explain how you build a scanner that's accurate enough that an AI can read the output and recognize specific models of guns, but is still not accurate enough to take clear pictures of an individual's body.