4 ms·
That's exactly the problem: selective actions favoring the monopolists are pursued aggressively (e.g. demolition of Net Neutrality), while actions which might a
by rectang 9y ago
That's exactly the problem: selective actions favoring the monopolists are pursued aggressively (e.g. demolition of Net Neutrality), while actions which might actually harm monopolists are deferred indefinitely. Thus the effect of supposed "deregulation" is to deliver the market to the monopolists.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- dominotw 9y agoYes but I was referring to comment saying there are current regulations that helps telecom monopolies that govt needs to destroy but it isn't. I was wondering what those regulations are that need to be destroyed.
- smichel17 9y agoI'm confused. Isn't that exactly what this is? > current regulations that helps telecom monopolies that govt needs to destroy but it isn't There are regulations at the state level. The federal government has the authority to stop these regulations. Yet they don't. Whether the bad regulation was implemented by state or federal government seems rather inconsequential.
- TheCoelacanth 9y agoState laws that outlaw the creation of municipal ISPs.