4 ms·
The wording of the questions is fairly precise, although the explanations may be a bit sloppier: He was, therefore, justified in believing that he was ca
by klochner 16y ago
The wording of the questions is fairly precise, although the explanations may be a bit sloppier:
He was, therefore, justified in believing that he was
carrying out God's will in undertaking these actions.
So according to your belief system, he was justified in believing it was God's will, but he was not justified in actually doing it.
(I didn't get any wrong :-P)
- anthonyb 16y agoBut if he goes against the will of God, surely that's inconsistent - given the emphasis that (eg.) the Bible places on unquestioning obedience to God? Unless he believes in an evil God...
- andymorris 16y agoThere's plenty of stuff in the Bible about God allowing/condoning/performing murder and rape as well though .... http://www.evilbible.com/Murder.htm http://www.evilbible.com/Murder.htm http://www.evilbible.com/Rape.htm http://www.evilbible.com/Rape.htm -- Ayjay on Fedang
- anthonyb 16y agoThat's exactly what I meant: God says "do '" - you do X, no questions asked. Assuming that you believe in the absolute will of God, of course...