3 ms·
> Q# is more esoteric than Q is. That in no way negates my point. It's not a question of which is more obscure, but that the 'original' item is obscure in the
by doktrin 9y ago
> Q# is more esoteric than Q is.
That in no way negates my point. It's not a question of which is more obscure, but that the 'original' item is obscure in the first place.
One unknown language reusing part of another's name means that nobody's gonna be legitimately confused or misled here. Moreover, they derive practically no benefit whatsoever by piggybacking on the (limited) fame of the 'original'. Curl is a different story altogether.
- geocar 9y ago> That in no way negates my point. I thought you were genuinely confused as to why I was offended and was responding as such. I had no idea that you believed your lack of opinion and offence somehow invalidated mine. > One unknown language reusing part of another's name means that nobody's gonna be legitimately confused or misled here I'm not going to agree that q is generally "unknown" just because you don't know what it is.
- doktrin 9y ago> I had no idea that you believed your lack of opinion and offence somehow invalidated mine. Not at all. Your opinion is hilarious, but everyone's entitled to an opinion.