3 ms·
Is this equivalent to hell-banning censorship by an infrastructure layer? I understand the positive intent, but it feels wrong to have email content altered by
by ISL 9y ago
Is this equivalent to hell-banning censorship by an infrastructure layer?
I understand the positive intent, but it feels wrong to have email content altered by infrastructure layers. A slippery-slope argument may apply.
- death_syn 9y agoBut it isn't altering the mail content at all, it's altering the DNS records outside of it.
- durkie 9y agoit also seems like it could be easily technically circumvented: put an email address to which you have access on your phishing lists. see if it gets the mail as expected.
- tomschlick 9y agoSolution: stop using CF services for phishing which is exactly what CF wants them to do