2 ms·
Your list isn't complete. In addition to what you mentioned, there are: 6 Education 3 "Frontier" 13 Healthcare That seems like a pretty healthy mix. By only
by l4yao 9y ago
Your list isn't complete. In addition to what you mentioned, there are:
6 Education
3 "Frontier"
13 Healthcare
That seems like a pretty healthy mix. By only providing select points of the complete picture, aren't you contributing to the problem he's describing?
- mbesto 9y agoI provided those data points because they represent more than half of the portfolio. I never said that SC didn't make investments in "real problems", I was making a point that they were also investing in companies that could be considered "shitty, useless, idiotic companies" and/or "weren't solving 'real problems'". > That seems like a pretty healthy mix. Yes, these guys are very good investors, no doubt. As a fellow capitalist I too would have made the same bets. But that has nothing to do with my point - which is the vision of the fund is inconsistent with what I would consider the vision of the majority of the companies that are invested in. > aren't you contributing to the problem he's describing? How so?