2 ms·
I think it's going to be up to companies who produce such devices to invest in longevity. As long as they produce software updates which require new hardware, p
by ioquatix 9y ago
I think it's going to be up to companies who produce such devices to invest in longevity. As long as they produce software updates which require new hardware, people are going to eventually need to update the hardware.
Unfortunately, right now, it doesn't seem like it's in the best interest of companies to make a device that lasts for 10 years which they continue to support through software updates.
Sometimes I do a mental juggle: In my life, provided my phones last for ~3 years, I'll probably end up buying between 10-20 phones. Multiply that out by (in theory) the population of earth, * the exponential growth factor, and you suddenly realise how impossible that would be. So, somethings got to change - people have to optimise for what they've got, not what can be sold to them.
- maxerickson 9y agoPer Apple, a new iPhone results in emissions roughly equivalent to burning 3 gallons of gasoline. https://images.apple.com/environment/pdf/products/iphone/iPhone_8_PER_sept2017.pdf https://images.apple.com/environment/pdf/products/iphone/iPh... The CO2 emissions of course aren't a perfect proxy for the environmental impact (and Apple is likely a leader in reducing the amount so other phones will be higher), but it at least gets us in the ball park. Looking at the numbers I don't think phones are the first thing to worry about.