> but a lot of this can be avoided by using non-idiomatic coding styles (like heavy dependence on TypedArrays). Too late to edit, but this really should have f

> but a lot of this can be avoided by using non-idiomatic coding styles (like heavy dependence on TypedArrays). Too late to edit, but this really should have finished with: ... at the cost of code that is more verbose yet the opposite of self-documenting, inherently frail even if you put wrapper-functions around those typed arrays, and likely to require massive changes all over the code-base for the smallest updates. In my opinion, unless you have a really good reason to not use alternative options like WASM or Emscripten, trying to squeeze that kind of performance out of vanilla JavaScript it's unlikely to be worth the technical debt.