This might be a more thorough source for that instead of arstechnica http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/11/29/public-comments-to-the-federal-communications-commis

This might be a more thorough source for that instead of arstechnica http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/11/29/public-comments-to-the-federal-communications-commission-about-net-neutrality-contain-many-inaccuracies-and-duplicates/ http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/11/29/public-comments-to-the... About 6% where unique. Most were against net neutrality, but the single most repeated one was a pro-neutrality comment submitted 2.8M times. > That's the part that should have people overturning tables. Overturning tables because it is not against the law, so they should make it illegal, or because it is against the law and he was lying?