But you are aware real-world compilers are exploiting more and more UB and keep breaking existing software? Maybe you are, but the comment does not seem to refl

But you are aware real-world compilers are exploiting more and more UB and keep breaking existing software? Maybe you are, but the comment does not seem to reflect that. Either way: The good thing is, after compiler writers start exploiting a kind of UB they add options like `-fno-strict-aliasing` and pinky swear that option preserves the UB. I agree a useful checker should support real-world relevant C dialects.