4 ms·
> But it costs more for most of the things. Which is exactly why it is subsidized. The goal is not to save companies money, but to save natural resources. Now,
by mrpopo 9y ago
> But it costs more for most of the things.
Which is exactly why it is subsidized. The goal is not to save companies money, but to save natural resources. Now, I agree it is debatable whether recycling achieves those goals, but a free-market approach, as introduced in the video, will only be more harmful.
- pas 9y ago> Which is exactly why it is subsidized That could be spent on more natural resource conserving things. That's the argument. In particular, it could be spent on "fighting" climate change.