Let’s wrap it up. Confuses engineering and science. Reduces engineering activities to closed problems. Thinks science does not successfully offers models for fu

Let’s wrap it up. Confuses engineering and science. Reduces engineering activities to closed problems. Thinks science does not successfully offers models for fuzzy systems (<cough> thermodynamics, man </cough>). Puts doubts on the fact that technology enabled human progress above its animal condition. And finally, seems to ignore that the main role of an engineer is to safely /lead/ the work in factory or on construction sites. Really, I have seldom read something so inaccurate, up to the point where I suspect it may have been written on the sole purpose of annoying the HN crowd...