>1. Non-engineers are better leaders because they can find solutions to "wicked problems", problems with many interacitng parts where there is no predefined obj

>1. Non-engineers are better leaders because they can find solutions to "wicked problems", problems with many interacitng parts where there is no predefined objectively right or wrong solution. I'm not making the claim that non-engineers are better leaders. I'm merely saying the analytical approach of solving problems works against (rather than helping) any resolution of a human system problem. I'm not making a claim of non-engineers knowing how to solve wicked problems (they're called wicked by researchers _because_ there is no solution).