2 ms·
> it squanders societal resources to exempt able-bodies people from work simply because they’re old. That sounds like the kind of a decision a paperclip maximi
by scarmig 9y ago
> it squanders societal resources to exempt able-bodies people from work simply because they’re old.
That sounds like the kind of a decision a paperclip maximizer would make to me.
"Societal resources" not being squandered is a perverse thing to optimize for.
Consider two worlds:
1) A world that automatically makes N widgets, and people could add an additional N widgets but choose not to
2) A world that automatically makes 0 widgets, and people add an additional N widgets because they choose to
If you're going for "not squandering societal resources" as the main metric of a society's value, world 2) is strictly superior, because people waste less time on frivolities like leisure and pleasure.
I'm open to arguments, though, that we should spread more leisure and pleasure around the age distribution instead of backloading it. I expect I'd be convinced, even.
- rayiner 9y agoThe situation we’re dealing with is scenario 3: a world that makes N widgets, and everyone is used to the quality of life that comes from the society making N widgets, but the population is decreasing and making N widgets is becoming harder and harder. In that situation, why should able-bodied old people get a pass on working? Japan is not a post-scarcity society. Even if income we distributed completely evenly, it would be about $43,000 per year. That’s comfortable, but not so much that Japan could afford to produce a lot less and still enjoy the kind of lifestyle people associate with a developed country.