> Thus anyone claiming an objective basis for a problem in society is taking a simplistic view. And that’s my issue with saying technology is causing progress.

> Thus anyone claiming an objective basis for a problem in society is taking a simplistic view. And that’s my issue with saying technology is causing progress. The author seems to create a false dichotomy between solving “wicked problems” according to a pure engineering approach and the alternative, which is not articulated. Yes, there is probably not an engineering solution analogous to building a bridge to issues such as poverty. There is, however, a boatload of research about various facets of the problem that will inform a good solution. A good leader will become apprised of this research and use it to support a position that they advocate for. The ultimate position will of course be motivated by values, culture, etc but if it ignores evidence - gathered by science - or execution - informed by engineering, then it’s not a good solution.