3 ms·
>Among other things, it can't measure long-term recall or the ability to rehearse/learn information and skills over time The vocabulary battery would seem to m
by Houshalter 9y ago
>Among other things, it can't measure long-term recall or the ability to rehearse/learn information and skills over time
The vocabulary battery would seem to measure long term memorization ability. It actually correlates with IQ better than any other test. Also SAT tests are often used as a proxy for IQ because they correlate so well with it.
>It's our need to have a single spectrum from mental retardation to genius-level that's led us to try to create a test which assigns a number to intelligence. But intelligence is multidimensional and an IQ test just fills in some of those dimensions.
No, it's not. Please learn what you are talking about. It was once believed that intelligence was multidimensional. But then scientists realized all those different dimensions correlated amazingly well. E.g. people with better memory were much more likely to be better at puzzle solving. And a single factor, g, could explain most of the variance. IQ tests try to measure g, which is very predictive of general cognitive ability.
- barry-cotter 9y ago> Also SAT tests are often used as a proxy for IQ because they correlate so well with it. That understates it. The SAT is an IQ test, strenuously as the College Board May deny it. The test was originally the scholastic aptitude test and results from it correlate with other IQ tests just as well as results from IQ tests correlate with each other. If anybody reading wants to know more about the broad field of which IQ is a small part the Wikipedia article on psychometrics is quite good. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychometrics https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychometrics