> They wouldn't know what was IPFS and what was regular encrypted TCP The extreme conclusion of state-sponsored censorship is not a black list or DPI. It is a

> They wouldn't know what was IPFS and what was regular encrypted TCP The extreme conclusion of state-sponsored censorship is not a black list or DPI. It is a white list. It is easy to restrict traffic to a small set of addresses that are rigorously monitored for any ability to proxy non-conforming traffic. Everything else would get dropped on the floor. IPFS and the like sit too high in the OSI layers to combat state sponsored censorship in the long-run. It makes me wonder what the target market is. If this ever got big, it would just trigger the next step in the arms race it is incapable of sustaining