3 ms·
There is no evidence at all of any lack of "integrity", here. This was simply a stupid mistake. That's it.
by Bud 9y ago
There is no evidence at all of any lack of "integrity", here. This was simply a stupid mistake. That's it.
- mythrwy 9y agoThat "mistake" aspect is addressed in the article. Multiple sources make it unlikely it was "mistake". It was almost certainly disinformation. The "mistake" was running with unverified information. Consistently making "mistakes" that go in one direction indicates lack of integrity.
- mcphage 9y ago> Multiple sources make it unlikely it was "mistake". It was almost certainly disinformation. The "mistake" was running with unverified information. When multiple sources agree, it's not unverified—it's a deliberately spread lie. > Consistently making "mistakes" that go in one direction indicates lack of integrity. Consistently getting lied to in one direction implies that the people spreading these lies have a specific ideological goal in mind.
- testvox 9y agoWhy do you disagree with the evidence presented by the intercept? It seems to me that there was an intent to misinform the public, either by multiple sources deliberately feeding the wrong information to multiple news agencies or the news agencies misrepresented how many independent sources had verified the information.