4 ms·

Don't use computers for anything you want to keep private.

• vortico 9y ago
  Or rather, proprietary software and hardware.
  • ryanlol 9y ago
    Why would non-proprietary software and hardware not be insecure?
    • vortico 9y ago
      Because typically you can't get away with sneaking code like `void keylogger() {` into freely available code. Even if hidden well, it will be discovered sooner or later with enough eyes. The only insecurities "allowed" by open-source code are accidents, and these can be discovered much quicker than accidents included in proprietary code.
      • ryanlol 9y ago
        In practice the situation is a little different though https://archive.fosdem.org/2017/schedule/event/linux_desktop_versus_windows10/attachments/slides/1730/export/events/attachments/linux_desktop_versus_windows10/slides/1730/fosdem_linux_desktop_security.pdf https://archive.fosdem.org/2017/schedule/event/linux_desktop... Perhaps you've heard of the disaster known as X? It's pretty clear that 'security' has never been a concern for Linux desktop developers, what software would you choose to run on your open source hardware instead of linux? Here are a plenty of exploit mitigations that simply do not exist for Linux, https://www.blackhat.com/docs/us-16/materials/us-16-Weston-Windows-10-Mitigation-Improvements.pdf https://www.blackhat.com/docs/us-16/materials/us-16-Weston-W...
• devwastaken 9y ago
  You only get what your expectations are. If your expectations is defeatism in the privacy space, then you're only creating what you don't want.