4 ms·
I'm glad you brought up that article, because it illustrates that two consenting adults were participating in their own life choices -- choices which we as a co
by sillysaurus3 9y ago
I'm glad you brought up that article, because it illustrates that two consenting adults were participating in their own life choices -- choices which we as a community feel obliged to be inclusive of, no matter how much they offend us or make us uncomfortable; the essence of tolerance -- and yet once Larry was cleared of wrongdoing, he wasn't reinstated. In fact, he was asked to resign before the investigation was even completed.
- watwut 9y agoI would not trust him much, after I have seen the difference between how he framed situation and what the issue turned out to be. It sounds like the people in drupal organization ended with same opinion. Framing it being issue if comfortability is just manipulation. I don't know who it is "we" in what you wrote. I for one, feel no duty to include things that offend me. People, both men and women defend themselves when they are offended and those who don't are perceived as weak and treated as such. Also, trying to frame disagreements or ethical issues as "being offended" is yet another lately popular disengous framing. None of that has anything to do with lack of trust toward Garfield.