3 ms·
1. The NSA says that RSA 2048 should only be used to protect information that need to remain secret for at most a few years. Nobody should be using RSA 2048 to
by briansmith 16y ago
1. The NSA says that RSA 2048 should only be used to protect information that need to remain secret for at most a few years. Nobody should be using RSA 2048 to protect information that could get then jailed/hurt/killed 5 or 10 years from now.
2. The main advantage of ECC is that it is generally faster than RSA, especially for security levels that would require RSA keys larger than 2048 bits.
3. It is meaningless at this time to say that ECC is unnecessarily strong compared to RSA. It is possible to match the security of ECC using RSA at every level. But, a linear increase in ECC key size requires the RSA key size to increase exponentially. For example, to match the strength of AES-128 you need a 256-bit ECC key or a 3072-bit RSA key, whereas to match the strength of AES-256 you need a 384-bit ECC key or a 15,360-bit RSA key.
- lolipop1 16y agoNobody should store information that could get them jailed/hurt/killed 5 or 10 years from now.