4 ms·
I don't think we can learn much from how an engine learns, but we certainly can learn from its results. For example, there's this interesting discussion: https
by forgot-my-pw 9y ago
I don't think we can learn much from how an engine learns, but we certainly can learn from its results.
For example, there's this interesting discussion: https://www.reddit.com/r/chess/comments/7ibzq4/stockfish_vs_alphazero_jerrys_analysis_of/dqy4yzc/ https://www.reddit.com/r/chess/comments/7ibzq4/stockfish_vs_...
Because Alphazero did not learn from human games, it looks at the different pieces without attaching values like we do. It has no problems sacrificing a higher "valued" piece for the sake of its strategy.
- irascible 9y agoYeah. Our human chess heuristics are biased toward strategies that fit within a human working memory. Alphagos working memory is orders of magnitude larger.