4 ms·
I think the argument is something along the lines of: the public hears that an engineer is making certain claims and then push for the laws to be changed. Runni
by cname 9y ago
I think the argument is something along the lines of: the public hears that an engineer is making certain claims and then push for the laws to be changed. Running of yellow/red lights ends up killing a lot of people. Perhaps without this passive enforcement, more people would die.
Having read some local news about the incident, it sounds like his wife blatantly ran a light according to the laws of Oregon and he attempted to get it thrown out using a dubious technical argument.
http://www.oregonlive.com/commuting/index.ssf/2014/02/joseph_rose_yellow_light_beave.html http://www.oregonlive.com/commuting/index.ssf/2014/02/joseph...
- valuearb 9y agoHis arguments actually were very good. Response time is never instantaneous. Oregon's yellow light law is incredibly dangerous. No one knows when it will end, stopping in the middle of an intersection can create an accident too.
- Johnny555 9y agoI think the argument is something along the lines of: the public hears that an engineer is making certain claims and then push for the laws to be changed If laws are passed based only on the claims of any person (regardless of his engineering certifications) and without any independent validation that's not the fault of the person making the claim.