3 ms·

Yes, incredibly. CDS's are a form of insurance. It can be hard for someone not in the industry to see the importance of these as it doesn't affect yoru day to

Yes, incredibly. CDS's are a form of insurance. It can be hard for someone not in the industry to see the importance of these as it doesn't affect yoru day to day life. Just imagine your day to day life where you can't get any isurance at all. No car insurance, no house insurance, no medical insurance. That's the extreme case, in all likely hood the more likely scenario would be all your insurance tripling in price as no provider can hedge their risk vai reinsurance, etc. To me issuance is very important and one of the pillars of modern society. If insurance going away, or atleast being inaccessible to 99% of the population that doesn't seem to be "terrible" to you then I'm not sure what explanation I can give you to help you understand :)

buxtehude 9y ago
If CDS market disappeared or dried up - the broader insurance market will survive and exist just as it had prior to 1994 when the first CDS arrived.
JackFr 9y ago
Credit default swaps were invented in 1994. Liquid bond markets existed for centuries without them (1602 for the Amsterdam Bourse and the late middle ages for the Italian city-states). CDS's are a form of insurance -- that's true. But in the case of a regular property/casualty insurance, you can't typically insure something you have no financial interest in. For CDS's, that's the base case. It is claimed that CDS's originally were created to allow investors to insulate themselves against the economic shock of defaults. That's barely true. CDS's are, and have always been, instruments of leverage (gearing). They allow credit traders to earn a higher return by taking on the credit risk with a smaller outlay of capital. I certainly don't want them to go away, but let's not kid ourselves that 1) they are fundamental to the credit market, or 2) they're not subject to potential abuse.
- chollida1 9y ago
  Alright I'll bite. I fully agree with this. > 2) they're not subject to potential abuse. But to be fair, no one claimed otherwise;) I'd appreciate it if you can change my mind but you really haven't' laid out a good argument yet. My thesis is that CDS's allow the credit markets to be larger than they would be without them, not that credit markets can't function without them. Obviously credit markets have existed before the ability to easily hedge out risk I mean I think you'd have to agree that hedging and risk minimization is a good thing and something that allows the market to be alot larger and more liquid due to the ability to hedge out risk with them. If swaps go away tomorrow, what replaces them? How do people hedge out credit risk without any form of swaps?
  - JackFr 9y ago
    My argument is that they are not now, and never were, primarily a hedging instrument. While they can be used for hedging, like options for instance, they are primarily used for leverage. That is, it is much cheaper go long or short a particular name with CDS than it is just trading bonds. (Especially short which used to be nearly impossible.) It is argued that this actually allows for better price discovery more efficiency in the credit markets. But that has be balanced with the fact that the CDS's have become untethered from the actual bonds that they purport to insure, and the tail has begun to wag the dog (as evidenced in the original article.)

buxtehude 9y ago

If CDS market disappeared or dried up - the broader insurance market will survive and exist just as it had prior to 1994 when the first CDS arrived.

JackFr 9y ago

Credit default swaps were invented in 1994. Liquid bond markets existed for centuries without them (1602 for the Amsterdam Bourse and the late middle ages for the Italian city-states). CDS's are a form of insurance -- that's true. But in the case of a regular property/casualty insurance, you can't typically insure something you have no financial interest in. For CDS's, that's the base case. It is claimed that CDS's originally were created to allow investors to insulate themselves against the economic shock of defaults. That's barely true. CDS's are, and have always been, instruments of leverage (gearing). They allow credit traders to earn a higher return by taking on the credit risk with a smaller outlay of capital. I certainly don't want them to go away, but let's not kid ourselves that 1) they are fundamental to the credit market, or 2) they're not subject to potential abuse.

chollida1 9y ago
Alright I'll bite. I fully agree with this. > 2) they're not subject to potential abuse. But to be fair, no one claimed otherwise;) I'd appreciate it if you can change my mind but you really haven't' laid out a good argument yet. My thesis is that CDS's allow the credit markets to be larger than they would be without them, not that credit markets can't function without them. Obviously credit markets have existed before the ability to easily hedge out risk I mean I think you'd have to agree that hedging and risk minimization is a good thing and something that allows the market to be alot larger and more liquid due to the ability to hedge out risk with them. If swaps go away tomorrow, what replaces them? How do people hedge out credit risk without any form of swaps?
- JackFr 9y ago
  My argument is that they are not now, and never were, primarily a hedging instrument. While they can be used for hedging, like options for instance, they are primarily used for leverage. That is, it is much cheaper go long or short a particular name with CDS than it is just trading bonds. (Especially short which used to be nearly impossible.) It is argued that this actually allows for better price discovery more efficiency in the credit markets. But that has be balanced with the fact that the CDS's have become untethered from the actual bonds that they purport to insure, and the tail has begun to wag the dog (as evidenced in the original article.)