3 ms·
Sorry. Libertarian philosophy is my bete noire. But the point is evident enough: I highly doubt libertarians can offer a credible macro-economic justification f
by Emma_Goldman 9y ago
Sorry. Libertarian philosophy is my bete noire. But the point is evident enough: I highly doubt libertarians can offer a credible macro-economic justification for the creation of a decentralised currency sustained by the whims of the market alone, and that they rely on the force of a prior moral theory. If the moral theory is void, so is the justification. I'm not sure how you would go about justifying bitcoin on its own terms. Its outside of effective social control, consumes masses of electricity, relies on centralised economies of scales in mining, and doesn't have any use-function apart from being a store of value. I imagine that blockchain technologies will have lots of useful applications down the road, but bitcoin is a primitive piece of technology that probably has a net negative effect on the world.
- pc2g4d 9y ago> being a store of value You yourself have hit on the justification for Bitcoin's use.
- chrischen 9y agoBitcoin relies on other people to buy in and hodl in order to fulfill its value storing properties. If people stopped buying more (at higher prices since it's a fixed supply) then the value would plummet, and that would be a terrible value store if your value plummets while being stored in it.