4 ms·

Not trying to start a flame war here, buy what is the argument for using Rails over Express or Django/Flask for a new project ? Genuinely curious to know the be

• esaym 9y ago
  Well, in this case it looks like they have decent built in webpack support.
• fleetfox 9y ago
  I can only comment regarding Django and it mostly boils down to python vs Ruby and what is idiomatic to them
• sho 9y ago
  You can't compare Rails to Express. It's a much, much more full-featured web framework. JS doesn't really have an equivalent to Rails (that I know of). Django is comparable in scope but Rails is many times more popular and a lot more work has gone into it. IMO you would need a very good, specific reason to choose Django over the far more popular Rails.
  • orb_yt 9y ago
    > JS doesn't really have an equivalent to Rails (that I know of). Probably Meteor, though not as mature as Rails.
  • Can_Not 9y ago
    Not as mature as rails, obviously, but Adonisjs and sailsjs are options.
• desireco42 9y ago
  Genuinely to answer, Rails offer much richer environment, Express is pretty much bare bones server, Flask is comparable to Sinatra, the only comparable thing is Django and, especially in new version it got much better, I still think Rails is much more flexible solution, which offers you a lot already premade stuff, with your ability to control how things will be used, still quite significant. Most of all, I believe a set of good practices enforced or encouraged with Rails is what distinguish it over all other frameworks. Most difficutlty with Rails is after few years when you need to upgrade, I feel a lot of busy work has to happen then.
• deleted 9y ago
  [deleted]
• TomK32 9y ago
  One thing you probably hear a lot from Ruby devs: The language makes you happy.
• pbrb 9y ago
  There really aren't any major benefits/downsides anymore regardless of what you'll read. To clear one thing up, you should compare Rails/Django/Sails (each language's "full" web framework), and Sinatra/Flask/Express (minimalist web frameworks). Each of the full frameworks offer a flavor or configuration of the framework that is focused to building RESTful APIs, and you can build the front end in whatever you want. The only major difference between frameworks in each class will be the language and ecosystem it uses. Of course there will be people that have heavy feelings towards whichever ecosystem they like the most that will tell you it's WAAAYYYY better than the other frameworks, but in reality it's nonsense. When starting a new project, my major decision is if I want to use the REST API flavor of one of these frameworks + react on the front end (substitute with your front end framework of choice), or build the project fully in the framework itself. I've been writing a lot of python lately, so I go with flask for small or quick/dirty stuff, Django or Django Rest Framework for bigger stuff. React on the front end if it needs to be a SPA.
  • sho 9y ago
    > There really aren't any major benefits/downsides anymore regardless of what you'll read Who made you the grand arbiter? There are huge differences. Rails is miles ahead in the options you present. Probably 90% of startups that don't have a specific reason not to, use Rails - and rightly so. Rails has over 65k commits. Django has 25k. Sails? Less than 7k. Don't tell me these are equivalent.
    • lozenge 9y ago
      You realise Django squashes every PR into a single commit right?
• Dirlewanger 9y ago
  Rails is a great entry point into web development, because it Just Works. If you need to do something not included, there's most likely a Ruby gem that integrates seamlessly with Rails. Need authentication? Authorization? Audit trails? Piping logs to different systems? There's several mature options for each in the Rails ecosystem.
• mmontoya 9y ago
  Rails is a very mature set of DSL tools. There is nothing even close to the level of integration, richness, community, and documentation that Rails offers. Ruby by itself is a powerful reason to develop with Rails.