3 ms·
> Many attempts have been made to construct public-key encryption systems based on problems known to be NPC, but it always seems that adding the necessary trap-
by vmind 16y ago
> Many attempts have been made to construct public-key encryption systems based on problems known to be NPC, but it always seems that adding the necessary trap-door reduces the difficulty of the problem to sub-NPC. RSA and Diffie-Hellman-Merkle-Williamson key negotiation rely on the difficulty of factoring and discrete logarithms respectively, but these are known (or believed - not sure of the current state) to be sub-NPC.
A clarification here is that these rely upon the existence of one way functions, of which discrete logarithms and factoring are conjectured to be in. A proof of the existence of one way functions is actually a slightly stronger result than P!=NP (as it relates to languages with only a single accepting state rather than many. The name of the class escapes me and Complexity Zoo is unresponsive at the moment)
- mfukar 16y agoJust to answer your query here: integer factorization is still suspected to be outside of P, NP-complete and co-NP-complete (recently some have hinted that it may in fact be NP-complete, I cannot track the link to the email discussion atm). No proof for either of those claims exists yet. Discrete logarithm has been found to be in BQP (Shor's algorithm), and therefore not NP-complete, since BQP is suspected to be disjoint from NP-complete. No proof of this claim is available, either.