3 ms·
Scott Aaronson does not explicitly say the proof is wrong, but says > If P≠NP has indeed been proved, my life will change so dramatically that having to pay $2
by svat 16y ago
Scott Aaronson does not explicitly say the proof is wrong, but says
> If P≠NP has indeed been proved, my life will change so dramatically that having to pay $200,000 will be the least of it. […] If P≠NP is proved, then to whatever extent theoretical computer science continues to exist at all, it will have a very different character.
and
> I can afford $200k, but not in the same way Bill Gates can afford $200k.
- studer 16y agoDiscussed here: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1587405 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1587405 As randomwalker says, it's not entirely obvious that Aaronson is betting against the proof.