2 ms·
This is an New Scientist article on an epidemiological study on the causes of myopia. The link is to a blog which copied the content. The original is behind a p
by keeptrying 16y ago
This is an New Scientist article on an epidemiological study on the causes of myopia. The link is to a blog which copied the content. The original is behind a paywall.
The fact that this paper is behind a paywall makes me freaking mad because it could literally save the eyesight of a huge number of people.
Original Article:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20427331.100-generation-specs-stopping-the-shortsight-epidemic.html?page=1 http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20427331.100-generatio...
Actual Content:
http://www.sunilreddy.com/?p=1429 http://www.sunilreddy.com/?p=1429
An excerpt:
On average the children in Sydney spent nearly 14 hours per week outside, and only 3 per cent developed myopia. In contrast, the children in Singapore spent just 3 hours outside, and 30 per cent developed myopia. Once again, close work had a minimal influence; the Australian children actually spent more time reading and in front of their computers than the Singaporeans
- mattmaroon 16y agoFrom what I've read it's not proximity that matters. It's brightness at close range. http://www.poynton.com/notes/brightness_and_contrast/ http://www.poynton.com/notes/brightness_and_contrast/ gives us a good setup procedure.