2 ms·
The incentive to save money exists regardless and nowise leads to arbitration as the only option.
by pishpash 9y ago
The incentive to save money exists regardless and nowise leads to arbitration as the only option.
- Latty 9y agoI'm not sure what you are saying. My point was that political support for allowing consumer arbitration to exist is increased (despite it being largely unpopular with the public), because it reduces court cases which is cheaper for the government. You are saying that there is incentive to save money, but it doesn't at all affect politician's opinions on consumer arbitration?
- pishpash 9y agoI'm saying consumers will already choose arbitration if it achieves the same utility, because it's cheaper for them as well. If politicians were not in the pockets of lobbyists they would see that human nature already saves the government money. I argue politicians are not motivated by saving the government money, at all -- seriously, when have they ever been?