2 ms·

(Disclaimer: This post is about GH stars as a metric. Disputing this metric is not denigrating the project, and I actually think the project is pretty neat.) H

(Disclaimer: This post is about GH stars as a metric. Disputing this metric is not denigrating the project, and I actually think the project is pretty neat.) However, it doesn't tell you how interested someone is in your project--only that they're interested enough to click a button on their mouse. Moreover, it doesn't even tell you much about how interesting your project is; it doesn't tell you what portion of your GH page's visitors thought it was sufficiently interesting to click the button. They might well get another 1K from this HN article; does that mean their project became twice as interesting today?

aprdm 9y ago
From my perspective and how I judge it, yes. If I was investigating some password solution in Go and gloss over a gopass project with 1k stars I would certainly investigate it. If another project only has two stars it would get investigated later in case gopass doesn't meet my requirements. That is not the only metric I use but it is a first pass. I don't think anyone has time to analyze every project out there to see if they're good or not. It's a little like how people filter out some CVs based on X attribute. Which is unfair and it isn't the perfect metric but when the volume is too big you gotta have a first filter. Obviously if someone in my network highly recommend a CV, or, in this case, a Golang pass tool, I would investigate it first