3 ms·
I think the data types look fine. If I'm using such a database, I don't think I want the CRDT data types to be abstracted away behind some general-purpose (SQL?
by lopatin 9y ago
I think the data types look fine. If I'm using such a database, I don't think I want the CRDT data types to be abstracted away behind some general-purpose (SQL?) interface. Can that even be done? I'd rather just pay the small price of restructuring my data into maps and sets and have the CRDT database do the rest without any extra indirection.
- jpdsousa 9y agoWell, i've been working on an SQL interface for AntidoteDB for my master thesis, and yes, it can be done. However, there are some limitations. At this point we are mostly focusing in constraints (i.e. invariant preservation), and we've already figured out stuff like numeric bounds, entity integrity and referential integrity (this last one is quite interesting IMO). Github: https://github.com/JPDSousa/AQL https://github.com/JPDSousa/AQL