> I'm stating that institutions weigh the tradeoffs, which is a pretty neutral statement. But you cite that as a "problem" in your previous comment: > Isn't t

> I'm stating that institutions weigh the tradeoffs, which is a pretty neutral statement. But you cite that as a "problem" in your previous comment: > Isn't this exactly the problem we're seeing in sexual harassment and sexual assault cases outside of politics, though? Decision making based on tradeoffs and acknowledgment of human frailties is better than decision making based on unrealistic absolute categorizations. (For instance, we'd all be better off if we acknowledged that humans tend to be prejudiced, because we're designed that way by evolution -- as opposed to the "racist/not-racist" dichotomy that drives current discussion. But it will be a long time before society ever arrives at a consensus on that...)