8 ms·
Good write-up. I'm curious about two more things: 1. What caused the crash on the synchronous replica? Was it just a coincidence and completely unrelated to th
by testplzignore 9y ago
Good write-up. I'm curious about two more things:
1. What caused the crash on the synchronous replica? Was it just a coincidence and completely unrelated to the primary failure?
2. Given the three conditions necessary for the cluster to break, was the behavior of the Pacemaker software expected? I.e., was this a gotcha that should be in the Pacemaker documentation, or a bug?
- Sinjo 9y ago1. Unfortunately the logs don't give any detail there. Most likely something arrived down the replication connection that the process couldn't handle, and it crashed. 2. Our understanding now is that INF is the strongest preference, whereas -INF is a veto. It would be very cool to have this confirmed 100% by someone who works on Pacemaker!