>At least if they would have went with s-expression syntax, they would have enabled metaprogramming and this would have solved some of the problems with missing

>At least if they would have went with s-expression syntax, they would have enabled metaprogramming and this would have solved some of the problems with missing features. Interesting. Do you think having that syntax would help with developing generics for Go (a thing that I've read a lot of devs feel want to be there in it)?