As for illegal immigration, I think it really only makes a difference in service jobs that need to be done in person. I have to compete with foreigners, and th

As for illegal immigration, I think it really only makes a difference in service jobs that need to be done in person. I have to compete with foreigners, and that wouldn't change even if you completely eliminated immigrants. the service I provide is also provided by companies in other countries, and really, location doesn't matter that much. I'm just pointing out, even if you completely stop immigration, manufacturing jobs and service jobs that are done over the 'net will still need to compete internationally, unless you also want to completely shut down international trade. So why should in-person service jobs get a subsidy that other types of work don't? Personally, I think the next outsourcing craze will be "inshoring" - if you are willing to hire a Midwesterner, you can get an American accent at Indian rates.