3 ms·
You'd think, but they still let some absolute trash through: http://bylr.net/3/2017/11/99month-is-a-steal-for-cloudapp-for-imobile/ http://bylr.net/3/2017/11/9
by prawn 9y ago
You'd think, but they still let some absolute trash through:
http://bylr.net/3/2017/11/99month-is-a-steal-for-cloudapp-for-imobile/ http://bylr.net/3/2017/11/99month-is-a-steal-for-cloudapp-fo...
It's incredible that on one hand, they can pull up competent and dedicated developers for a minor transgression, but then allow something as ugly and misleading as the above example.
- dep_b 9y agoThing is you can just keep trying to submit crap until you find somebody off-guard.
- jclardy 9y agoI know it first hand. Our app has an auto-renewing subscription, and they are nitpicking every little detail on it (Not letting us say "Free Trial" even though it is literally a free trial for a week, with the subscription price/renewal stated clearly on the same view.) Yet an app like iHeartRadio has a "Free Trial" button with no visible terms, no visible price, and no renewal frequency listed gets a pass. Plus they let those scam VPN apps through with a "Free Trial" that immediately charges you $99, and they stayed at the top of the grossing charts for days. It is insanely frustrating. The app review process at Apple is a joke now, honestly. I'm pretty sure it has been outsourced to some third party, we always get through on appeal, but why should a year old app with a 4.6 star rating with thousands of reviews have to appeal every single update submission. Sorry for the rant, just dealing with this exact problem as we speak.
- briandear 9y agoApp Review hasn’t been outsourced to anyone. As far as every single time having to appear — have you considered making the change that wouldn’t require an appeal?