4 ms·
Not that I don't believe you, but is there a source for this (the anti-trust ruling being specific to Intel hardware)? I'd love to read more about the specifics
by newhouseb 9y ago
Not that I don't believe you, but is there a source for this (the anti-trust ruling being specific to Intel hardware)? I'd love to read more about the specifics.
- narrator 9y agoIf you read the Wikipedia page and the linked ruling, you'll see that the language is very specific to "Operating Systems on Intel Compatible PCs". https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft_Corp https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft_C....
- benaadams 9y agoAnd it expired 8 - 10 years ago > Microsoft's obligations under the settlement, as originally drafted, expired on November 12, 2007. However, Microsoft later "agreed to consent to a two-year extension of part of the Final Judgments" dealing with communications protocol licensing.