9 ms·

You can build the pdf yourself from the LaTeX source: https://github.com/cplusplus/draft https://github.com/cplusplus/draft Or get the latest public draft from

You can build the pdf yourself from the LaTeX source: https://github.com/cplusplus/draft https://github.com/cplusplus/draft Or get the latest public draft from https://wg21.link/standard https://wg21.link/standard Or an html version: http://eelis.net/c++draft/ http://eelis.net/c++draft/

mratzloff 9y ago
Thanks. I just like having an official (not draft) copy. I'm a nerd. I just built from the LaTeX source and it's 32 pages longer than the public draft in the second link from 6 weeks ago. Maybe just additional descriptive language, but...
- Someone 9y ago
  Reading https://github.com/cplusplus/draft https://github.com/cplusplus/draft, it seems you had to generate figures from their dot source. If so, the result may depend on your installation (probably even if you use the same version of GraphViz but a different OS and/or set of fonts), and that can affect pagination. Also, are you sure you built for the same paper size? A4 vs US letter could explain the difference.
  - mratzloff 9y ago
    Well, you can see changes as recently as two days ago. https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/commit/83e302d3bb6a5f88554b1ec75e8aa51760458c5f https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/commit/83e302d3bb6a5f8855...
- vortico 9y ago
  The C++ draft and published standard are so similar, the only parties I imagine would need the published copy are gcc frontend developers, technical managers at IBM, etc. As an individual who gets into the deep dark crevices of C++, I've never needed the tiny details the published standard offers. They are mostly typographical.
  - jcelerier 9y ago
    iirc even gcc devs don't have it and use the draft
- gomijacogeo 9y ago
  In one way, the last draft is more canonical than the official spec - if you are talking chapter and verse to another person about the spec, odds are good that they are referring to the last public draft also.

mratzloff 9y ago

Thanks. I just like having an official (not draft) copy. I'm a nerd. I just built from the LaTeX source and it's 32 pages longer than the public draft in the second link from 6 weeks ago. Maybe just additional descriptive language, but...

Someone 9y ago
Reading https://github.com/cplusplus/draft https://github.com/cplusplus/draft, it seems you had to generate figures from their dot source. If so, the result may depend on your installation (probably even if you use the same version of GraphViz but a different OS and/or set of fonts), and that can affect pagination. Also, are you sure you built for the same paper size? A4 vs US letter could explain the difference.
- mratzloff 9y ago
  Well, you can see changes as recently as two days ago. https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/commit/83e302d3bb6a5f88554b1ec75e8aa51760458c5f https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/commit/83e302d3bb6a5f8855...
vortico 9y ago
The C++ draft and published standard are so similar, the only parties I imagine would need the published copy are gcc frontend developers, technical managers at IBM, etc. As an individual who gets into the deep dark crevices of C++, I've never needed the tiny details the published standard offers. They are mostly typographical.
- jcelerier 9y ago
  iirc even gcc devs don't have it and use the draft
gomijacogeo 9y ago
In one way, the last draft is more canonical than the official spec - if you are talking chapter and verse to another person about the spec, odds are good that they are referring to the last public draft also.