3 ms·

It was literally impossible for it to occur. The numbers it required were so large that there's no device with enough memory for the bug to show up.

• goldfire 9y ago
  Unless I misunderstand their test code, the article says they could reproduce the problem using an array of 67108864 Integer objects. That doesn't sound like an impossible amount of memory.
  • sli 9y ago
    It's also noted in the relevant thread on the Python mailing list[1], which also says that this is different from Java with regards to whether or not it can be triggered: "Since it's impossible to trigger the error on any current machine anyway (no machine has enough memory), increasing the size of the stack would be absurd. If you read the paper, they note that this is what the Java folks first did (they changed this part of timsort in a way that _did_ make it possible to provoke the stack overflow on current hardware)." [1]: https://bugs.python.org/msg236603 https://bugs.python.org/msg236603
    • detaro 9y ago
      It was impossible in the Python version. Not in Java.