3 ms·
I had a good talk with my ex-wife's uncle about this a few years ago. He's a record's archival specialist in Australia, and they seem to be doing a lot of work
by dnsworks 16y ago
I had a good talk with my ex-wife's uncle about this a few years ago. He's a record's archival specialist in Australia, and they seem to be doing a lot of work with Microfiche. Apparently it lasts quite a long time and is highly dense. They encode data in some sort of an xml format, and the first slide on each sheet has a reasonably explanatory description as to how to decode the data.
- gaius 16y agoB&W film is the best archival format I've come across, it'll last a century stored in a shoebox in the attic, and you can look at it just by holding it up to the light. That's important; anyone who picks it up regardless of their prior experience will know, this is a thing with information on. Would you even recognize a HD if you'd never seen one before?
- barrkel 16y agoI agree - I think this is the route for more substantial (centuries) storage. However, I'd probably wouldn't use xml - some variant of http://ronja.twibright.com/optar/ http://ronja.twibright.com/optar/ mentioned elsewhere on this page. I'd include the definition of a simple machine, and the text of a program written in opcodes for the machine, for decoding.