5 ms·
Haha. You question that you said „It’s not that “no one else” could do their job, but there’s not an unlimited supply of people who can meet the hiring bar“ Or
by hennsen 9y ago
Haha.
You question that you said „It’s not that “no one else” could do their job, but there’s not an unlimited supply of people who can meet the hiring bar“ Or what?
I didn’t propose a concrete strategy.
I just doubt the things have to be as they are and pose a lot of questions why they are as they are.
Then you build exactly one fictional scenario that would make things maybe(not necessarily - there are options... maybe there is a number of smart people who don’t want to learn for artificial interview scenarios, maybe they don’t have some university degree) go bad for one employer and imply the conclusion everything has to be and stay as it is.
Do you see the problem here?
- rlanday 9y agoI don't understand your point of view. You work in tech, right? Do you want tech companies to pay their employees less?
- hennsen 9y agoWe talk about the question if managers have to be that expensive. And I’m open to a yes if there are valid points and my questions about it answered. We don’t talk about what I want to get paid. You’re steering away from the topic, right after questioning something that you said just exactly as cited, and dont answer straight questions. Do you wanna take part in a discussion or just confuse abd avoid it?