4 ms·
IMHO it’s less about Skylake being special and more about the previous generations having fairly small improvements over their predecessors. Broadwell was neve
by tomalpha 9y ago
IMHO it’s less about Skylake being special and more about the previous generations having fairly small improvements over their predecessors.
Broadwell was never a huge leap for general purpose server performance. At least it didn’t get perceived as such. It seemed to concentrate on being good at the low power end to compete with ARM and more virtualization features iirc.
For some, rather like phones these days: they’re good enough not to need a refresh as often as they might have been.
For others Skylake is the first real jump / change in performance (the cache hierarchy and core interconnect topology changes are particularly interesting to me).
For yet others, they delayed refreshing for longer than they used to: “we might as well wait until the next release now”. And once Skylake was out in all its thousand-different-sku glory they bought it.
Edit: typo
- rincebrain 9y agoBroadwell for servers was noteworthy for the Xeon-D line, which has some neat performance characteristics in a tiny power envelope, but it was very targeted at the laptop market - hell, there were only 6 models of desktop processors, compared to 32 laptop models, or 50+ server processors (half of which are the Xeon-D line, and the other half were so delayed that the E3 Skylakes landed before the E5 Broadwells did, and then the E5 Skylake equivalents got delayed forever, presumably in part to finally also support the socketable Xeon Phis Intel wanted so much)
- mtgx 9y agoCannon Lake was also supposed to arrive right after Skylake. I think it's been delayed to 2019 now.