2 ms·
okay, I guess I am nitpicking on the word axiom ^^. DRY-as-in-the-original-sense is not an axiom because you can actually give good and simple reasons from whi
by wirrbel 9y ago
okay, I guess I am nitpicking on the word axiom ^^.
DRY-as-in-the-original-sense is not an axiom because you can actually give good and simple reasons from which you can deduct the principle.
You are definitely are right in the sense, that treating soft truths as "hard facts" is a problem in software.
- crdoconnor 9y agoNo, I do mean is that properties of good code can all be boiled down to a set of fundamental principles. I think one of the defining features of all of those principles is that they directly conflict with one another. Good code means achieving a local minima, because up to a point, maximizing any one of these principles (e.g loose coupling) will inevitably violate one or more of the other fundamental principles. I.e. maximizing loose coupling often has the side effect of violating DRY or ramping up language complexity (another fundamental principle). I don't think you really can derive DRY from other principles, though I'd be curious to hear what you think it could be derived from.