5 ms·

Ask HN: Has anyone tried speed reading? Would you recommend practicing?

12 points by Gormisdomai 9y ago

muzani 9y ago
I've been speed reading for about 5 years. Yes, I highly recommend it. Like touch typing, it's something you wonder how you lived without. The bottleneck is comprehension though. Most speed reading techniques don't cover it. Learn to visualize and grasp concepts quickly. Speed reading also helps a lot in comprehension in that if you can skim the entire book you've already understood the gist of what the book is about. Just don't expect to read books much faster. The best books should be read slowly. If you're reading one book a day, you should question whether that book was worth reading.
- jason_slack 9y ago
  Can you share any resources for getting started? I'd like to at least try and see if it is something I would benefit from or not.
  - muzani 9y ago
    I use this course: https://www.udemy.com/become-a-superlearner-2-speed-reading-memory-accelerated-learning/ https://www.udemy.com/become-a-superlearner-2-speed-reading-... If you want something free, google Tim Ferriss's speed reading tips. They're easy to understand and get started with.
    - jason_slack 9y ago
      Thank you so much!
twobyfour 9y ago
I tried a speed reading course a long time ago. I didn't spend much time practicing, partly out of laziness and partly because the technique interfered with comprehension in such a way that I would end up spending double the time because I had to read the same page over and over again to get any information out of it whatsoever. Unsurprisingly, my day to day reading speed failed to improve at all. However, it seems to have made me very good at skimming and picking topics off a page. I can identify the one or two Google results I want to follow at half a glance, while people whom I know to be capable of reading at twice my speed are still reading through each headline separately. And I can run my eyes down a wall of tutorial text to pick out a couple key terms that identify the section I want to read in depth. In short: it didn't deliver the benefits promised, but that doesn't mean it was without any benefits.
tomdre 9y ago
A long time ago I read "Speed Reading" by Tony Buzan. It provides plenty of techniques, tricks, and exercises.
tugberkk 9y ago
If you are not 'slow', I don't think it is necessary. Of course, if you are working in a job which requires you to scan many things, of course go for it. I do it unintentionally. Probably because of how I learned to read. I also have very fast recognition of stuff so probably that is the reason. I am of course faster when I am reading novels and stuff, but I must say that 'visualization part' which you have while reading fiction is gone with me. I just scan and understand, and try to learn what happens next instead of creating a scene of that page etc.
- 0xf8 9y ago
  That "visualization part" is unfortunately, for the majority of people, how the human brain creates meaningful neural pathways and absorbs information. Not necessarily in a "visual" as in involving images way, but some form of connection to something you already know whether explicitly visual or abstract is how the brain creates memories. In my experience speed reading, it dramatically increased the rate of information intake, especially if using software to sequentially display text (like Spritz), and eventually with practice it was possible to retain comprehension as well, but never was I able to create lasting stores of that information. I could get through a non technical book in a few hours reading consistently around 700 wpm (taking breaks to rest the eyes) and could understand what I was reading in the moment, but can't say I remember much of anything from those books. They literally feel like a "blur" in my mind. Perhaps if the goal of reading is to identify specific information anywhere within a text quickly and move on to something else or switch to reading more mindfully at that point, then it may make sense. Personally, I read exclusively to obtain information and retain it. If I don't care to retain the information, I won't read it in the first place. So not being able to retain anything meaningful save for the few instances I slowed down ended up defeating the purpose for me. Lastly IIRC, I once read about the neuroscience of reading with regards to speed reading and the gist of the article ended up saying that it takes discrete periods literally measurable in observable time in order to form memories, and speed reading feeds in information continuously at a rate that does not allow for this crystallization to occur--because the actual reading is like a blocking operation neurologically to memory formation. When we read normally, we pause and reflect in various abstract ways on the information which creates connections and hence memories.
- 9y ago

12 points by Gormisdomai 9y ago

I've been speed reading for about 5 years. Yes, I highly recommend it. Like touch typing, it's something you wonder how you lived without. The bottleneck is comprehension though. Most speed reading techniques don't cover it. Learn to visualize and grasp concepts quickly. Speed reading also helps a lot in comprehension in that if you can skim the entire book you've already understood the gist of what the book is about. Just don't expect to read books much faster. The best books should be read slowly. If you're reading one book a day, you should question whether that book was worth reading.

jason_slack 9y ago
Can you share any resources for getting started? I'd like to at least try and see if it is something I would benefit from or not.
- muzani 9y ago
  I use this course: https://www.udemy.com/become-a-superlearner-2-speed-reading-memory-accelerated-learning/ https://www.udemy.com/become-a-superlearner-2-speed-reading-... If you want something free, google Tim Ferriss's speed reading tips. They're easy to understand and get started with.
  - jason_slack 9y ago
    Thank you so much!

twobyfour 9y ago

I tried a speed reading course a long time ago. I didn't spend much time practicing, partly out of laziness and partly because the technique interfered with comprehension in such a way that I would end up spending double the time because I had to read the same page over and over again to get any information out of it whatsoever. Unsurprisingly, my day to day reading speed failed to improve at all. However, it seems to have made me very good at skimming and picking topics off a page. I can identify the one or two Google results I want to follow at half a glance, while people whom I know to be capable of reading at twice my speed are still reading through each headline separately. And I can run my eyes down a wall of tutorial text to pick out a couple key terms that identify the section I want to read in depth. In short: it didn't deliver the benefits promised, but that doesn't mean it was without any benefits.

tomdre 9y ago

A long time ago I read "Speed Reading" by Tony Buzan. It provides plenty of techniques, tricks, and exercises.

tugberkk 9y ago

If you are not 'slow', I don't think it is necessary. Of course, if you are working in a job which requires you to scan many things, of course go for it. I do it unintentionally. Probably because of how I learned to read. I also have very fast recognition of stuff so probably that is the reason. I am of course faster when I am reading novels and stuff, but I must say that 'visualization part' which you have while reading fiction is gone with me. I just scan and understand, and try to learn what happens next instead of creating a scene of that page etc.

0xf8 9y ago
That "visualization part" is unfortunately, for the majority of people, how the human brain creates meaningful neural pathways and absorbs information. Not necessarily in a "visual" as in involving images way, but some form of connection to something you already know whether explicitly visual or abstract is how the brain creates memories. In my experience speed reading, it dramatically increased the rate of information intake, especially if using software to sequentially display text (like Spritz), and eventually with practice it was possible to retain comprehension as well, but never was I able to create lasting stores of that information. I could get through a non technical book in a few hours reading consistently around 700 wpm (taking breaks to rest the eyes) and could understand what I was reading in the moment, but can't say I remember much of anything from those books. They literally feel like a "blur" in my mind. Perhaps if the goal of reading is to identify specific information anywhere within a text quickly and move on to something else or switch to reading more mindfully at that point, then it may make sense. Personally, I read exclusively to obtain information and retain it. If I don't care to retain the information, I won't read it in the first place. So not being able to retain anything meaningful save for the few instances I slowed down ended up defeating the purpose for me. Lastly IIRC, I once read about the neuroscience of reading with regards to speed reading and the gist of the article ended up saying that it takes discrete periods literally measurable in observable time in order to form memories, and speed reading feeds in information continuously at a rate that does not allow for this crystallization to occur--because the actual reading is like a blocking operation neurologically to memory formation. When we read normally, we pause and reflect in various abstract ways on the information which creates connections and hence memories.
9y ago