2 ms·

This includes a c9-like project/workspace managing server as well as IDE: http://eclipse.org/che/getting-started/ http://eclipse.org/che/getting-started/

notamy 9y ago
I find the setup to be a bit of a pain: - Can't (easily?) use a Docker volume instead of mounting a directory from the host into the container - No real auth out of the box(?) - I get why it works like it does, but I don't really want to set up KeyCloak for a single application only - Doesn't seem to have Elixir support, but maybe I've not looked hard enough Mainly just my own pickiness, I think.
- deleted 9y ago
  [deleted]
- deleted 9y ago
  [deleted]
- mariolet 9y ago
  - Copy pasting this command will start Che on most platforms: `docker run --rm -ti -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock -v ~/.che:/data eclipse/che start`. We can't avoid mounting the docker socket but you are right we could probably avoid asking to provide a specific host folder (i.e. `~/.che`). But the downside of not providing a host folder would be that users won't have access to Che configuration files. Do you think that running command like `curl -sSL https://get.che.eclipse.org/ https://get.che.eclipse.org/ | sh ` would be better from a user perspective? - We currently distribute Che in two flavours: single and multi user. Single user is the default one and if you run the command above you will run single user Che. No need to setup KeyCloak :-) - I don't think we support Elixir yet but that's definitely something we would like to do. Do you know if there is any reliable Elixir language server?
  - benologist 9y ago
    I think the goal should be getting rid of all of the parameters so people who've used docker before don't need to look up how to start it and people who've not used docker before get a more legible command to paste.

2 ms·

This includes a c9-like project/workspace managing server as well as IDE: http://eclipse.org/che/getting-started/ http://eclipse.org/che/getting-started/

by benologist 9y ago

notamy 9y ago
I find the setup to be a bit of a pain: - Can't (easily?) use a Docker volume instead of mounting a directory from the host into the container - No real auth out of the box(?) - I get why it works like it does, but I don't really want to set up KeyCloak for a single application only - Doesn't seem to have Elixir support, but maybe I've not looked hard enough Mainly just my own pickiness, I think.
- deleted 9y ago
  [deleted]
- deleted 9y ago
  [deleted]
- mariolet 9y ago
  - Copy pasting this command will start Che on most platforms: `docker run --rm -ti -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock -v ~/.che:/data eclipse/che start`. We can't avoid mounting the docker socket but you are right we could probably avoid asking to provide a specific host folder (i.e. `~/.che`). But the downside of not providing a host folder would be that users won't have access to Che configuration files. Do you think that running command like `curl -sSL https://get.che.eclipse.org/ https://get.che.eclipse.org/ | sh ` would be better from a user perspective? - We currently distribute Che in two flavours: single and multi user. Single user is the default one and if you run the command above you will run single user Che. No need to setup KeyCloak :-) - I don't think we support Elixir yet but that's definitely something we would like to do. Do you know if there is any reliable Elixir language server?
  - benologist 9y ago
    I think the goal should be getting rid of all of the parameters so people who've used docker before don't need to look up how to start it and people who've not used docker before get a more legible command to paste.