3 ms·
Banks are allowed to hire armed security to shoot at potential robbers. They could require better vetting (maybe requiring the use of a debit card before the do
by jdavis703 9y ago
Banks are allowed to hire armed security to shoot at potential robbers. They could require better vetting (maybe requiring the use of a debit card before the doors are unlocked, metal detectors, etc). But instead they're allowed to skimp on less draconian security measures and go straight to guns. How is back hacking any different?
- mannykannot 9y agoYour example is one of intrusion prevention. The appropriate analogy for hacking back would be giving banks the power to conduct their own search and seizure operations. While lenders are permitted to repossess publicly-accessible property in certain circumstances, they cannot independently authorize and perform intrusions for that purpose.