3 ms·
> The author has decided to provide poor communication On the contrary! The author has decided to provide efficient, immediate, communication, instead of vague
by jstanley 9y ago
> The author has decided to provide poor communication
On the contrary! The author has decided to provide efficient, immediate, communication, instead of vaguely planning to send a more detailed reply later if she maybe gets around to it.
If everybody treated email this way it would be 100x more efficient. If her reply doesn't contain the info you need, just reply back asking for the info you need, and she'll reply within minutes.
- albertgoeswoof 9y agoBut what if you don't know the information you need to know? Or if you're worried about looking incompetent by asking because she always sends such curt replies? Or maybe you're just hacked off that you crafted an email to try to convey a point in a clear, concise manner and she just responded with a one word reply and you have no idea whether she read it and understood it at all
- jstanley 9y agoThey all sound like your problems, not hers.
- albertgoeswoof 9y agoThey’ll be hers when she’s fired
- MichaelMoser123 9y agoYou just wrote a concise reply as advocated by the linked article.
- therealdrag0 9y agoIsn't this what instant messaging is for?