4 ms·
The Patriot system actually has seen substantial changes since the first Gulf War. The first Gulf War used what are called 'PAC-2' systems. They've since develo
by icegreentea2 9y ago
The Patriot system actually has seen substantial changes since the first Gulf War. The first Gulf War used what are called 'PAC-2' systems. They've since developed and deployed PAC-3 systems. The list of changes is comprehensive. If nothing else, it uses a new missile that was designed from scratch to act in an anti-ballistic missile role (the PAC-2 used a missile designed for aircraft intercept - the two roles have really different end-game requirements). The radar, the intercept software on the missile itself, mission management software have all been modified.
The PAC-2 missile relied on its ground based radar to guide it onto the target, and relied on an explosive warhead to damage the target. The PAC-3 has an integrated radar to guide itself onto target and is capable of hit to kill intercept.
Now, those are all the claims anyways. We'll have to see how useful all these changes actually were.
- CalChris 9y agoTo quote Buck Turgidson in Dr. Strangelove, Well, I don't think it's quite fair to condemn the whole program because of a single slip up. The PAC-3 is based on the SDI ERINT, a missile which itself failed several tests and then finally passed a rigged test. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_Defense_Initiative#Extended_Range_Interceptor_(ERINT) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_Defense_Initiative#E...
- trothamel 9y agoAccording to https://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/patriot-ac-3-fote.htm https://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/patriot-ac-3-fo... , as of 2006 the PAC-3 was 19 of 22 on intercepting ballistic missile targets.
- sailfast 9y agoThanks - this is really useful information.